We are presently building up conflicts within the asset price frame:
Conflicts between asset values and GDP flows and their growth rates;
Between asset prices and return expectations;
Between human capital values and the distribution of those values and their impact on the overall wealth equation with respect to future consumption risks as well as asset pricing via increased asset focus of flows due to distribution dynamics;
Within portfolio structure and relative to the liquidity and capital security dynamics of liability streams.
All of this tied to the relationship between frame transitions, emergent properties and structural imbalances and unconventional monetary policy focused overly on asset price support.
One of the most important determinants of asset allocation is the risk premium on risky investments.
The lower the risk premium on risky assets the less rationale there is for their inclusion and the longer the time frame of “risky asset risk” that a portfolio will need to manage. Asset allocation decisions that involve allocating to longer term higher risk growth assets to provide the differential expenditure (income and capital liabilities less portfolio dividend, interest and other income) are about capturing differences in risk premiums.
But this also requires that asset allocation is also framed in terms of units of liabilities as opposed to just units of assets, such that risk management uses size and timing of liabilities as the primary determinant of rebalancing transactions and asset allocation decisions. The time frame of risk for risky assets is framed likewise in liabilities.